Sunday, July 10, 2022

The Search for Senenmut




 The supposed success with finding King Hatshepsut has brought to light many new questions about the location of the mummy of her foremost courtier Senenmut. The thought that he may be among the unidentified royal mummies is intriguing. Though the finding of Hatshepsut was made by the presence of a tooth there is still a lot of faith being placed in DNA perhaps not with mummified tissue but with bone or teeth.


Fortune has played its hand with the discovery of the intact tomb of Hatnofer and Ramose in the courtyard of their son Senenmut's prominent tomb at Sheik Abd el Qurna, TT71. Senenmut's tomb was explored by the Metropolitan Museum of Art's expedition in 1936 with the prize being the smashed brown quartzite sarcophagus which because it was unfinished has led some to believe that it was never used by Senenmut.


Though if it was used by Senenmut hopefully his mummy was not in it at the time of its thorough destruction. The DNA of Hatnofer and Ramose may well identify their son out of the unknown royal mummies if his mummy has been found though the chances of discovery of this individual are very remote

As it happens Senenmut's father Ramose was a skeleton when found and was probably not mummified while his mother was mummified but since excavation has become mostly a skeleton as well. This is good as little damage will occur to their remains for DNA tests to find their famous son.

Among the male mummy's from the cache tombs DB 320 and KV 35 that appear not to be a direct family member of the Thutmoside king's families. Perhaps the best choice must be the mummy in the coffin inscribed for Nibsoni and known as "Unknown man C". Described in his 1912 "Mummies Royal" G. E. Smith refers to the mummy as "tall, vigorous man","must have seemed a very giant amongst them, and is hardly likely to have sprung from such puny stock".


Mr. Smith makes this statement in reference to the XVIII Dynasty king's found in the cache with our unknown man "C". He says little more about this mummy other than the mummy had been riffled in modern times before the official discovery of the tomb. Unfortunately, the research on this individual is sparse though Mr. Smith believed the mummy's arm position suggests he dates before Thutmosis II.

A contender from around the correct period of the early Thutmoside king's including the reign of Hatshepsut. A couple thoughts have come to me in that the king's cache tomb DB 320 held a box with the name of Hatshepsut though the body of that king was not found in that cache. The box seems to be all that was collected from its find-spot unless it was found, and came into DB 320 with one of the mummies found there.


It has come to my notice that many if not most of Senenmut's statues are in good condition suggesting that he and his statues did not face a thorough damnatio memoriae after death, and that might make the smashed sarcophagus an anomaly that could have occurred hundreds or even thousands of years after Senenmut's passing.

From the king's cache at Deir el-Bahari was found the small box that contained the tooth belonging to the mummy identified as Hatshepsut found in Valley of the Kings tomb KV 60. Somehow the box became separate from Hatshepsut's burial. Hard to believe that the reburial commission would take the box and leave the kings mummy behind. There has to be the thought that her mummy was already gone by the time the reburial commission entered whichever tomb the box was found in. Perhaps removed by Thutmosis III, Hatshepsut's successor.

Senenmut had two choices for his burial including a tomb inside the Hatshepsut quarry near her mortuary temple at Deir el-Bahari. The tomb, when found by the Metropolitan Museum of Art's excavations was completely empty. It suggests that he was buried in his extremely prominent hilltop tomb at Sheik Abd el-Qurna where the smashed sarcophagus was found, and where his parents were buried.

Still, he may have died before Hatshepsut and been buried in her tomb. Thutmosis III or his successors may have removed the queen to KV 60 and left Senenmut and the box still in the tomb when found by the reburial commission, and as such both mummy and box may have ended up together in tomb DB 320.


Notes:

Saturday, January 8, 2022

Collecting Ancient Egypt in Stereo cards

The above is an 1870s view of the Sphinx and the great pyramid at Giza this is an early very rare French tissue card that has a second layer of tissue behind the tissue photograph which is colored in absurd pink and green so that when the light passes through these colors show through. As one can imagine these tissue windows are easily broken. Egypt is an uncommon subject of these tissue cards which often center around prominent rooms in European palaces and gardens.
Francis Frith was an early photographer photographing Egypt's and Nubia's monuments in the late 1850s. The above example shows the now lost temple of Gerf Hussein of which today the temple's inner sanctum lies at the bottom of Lake Nassar. Note the photographers signature in the bottom left corner.


Felix Bonfils was an early photographer of the middle east including Egypt and was the first photographer to market images of the middle east on a large scale certainly nothing like the companies that followed like Keystone or Underwood & Underwood. Here we have the temple of Dendur which today resides at 1000 5th Avenue New York in the Metropolitan Museum of Art. Felix Bonfils cards in good condition run from around $50-$100 and up each.
This card is a typical example of an Ingersoll card which was made on thinner cardboard in the early twentieth century 100 years later these cards have not curled the way most older stereo-views have. Ingersoll cards are in color but the same subjects also can be found in black and white. The reader would be advised to avoid buying Ingersoll, Keystone, and Underwood cards as singles as most are very common and are a better value buying in lots. Very similar cards were also distributed in cereal containers and are marked as such on the back.

 As stereoscope cards go this is a visual time machine that takes the viewer back more than 100+ years to this museum display. Today the pharaoh's mummy is no longer presented in his original coffin but in a hermetically sealed glass case under a piece of fine linen as befits the great king's dignity, unfortunately, the king's arms are no longer exposed. This like many Keystone cards can also be found in sepia by Underwood. The era of the stereoscope was between ca.1858-1939 which is around 80 years so many cards including this one are very common even today a century later though some sellers will try to convince the buyer that they are rare they are not. King Seti's mummy should be listed as a must-have in any Egyptian collection and is easily found for sale on the internet.
To start your own collection buy a nice condition stereo-viewer with a few dozen cards this should cost about $100, make sure the sliding bar that holds the cards is present often they are sold missing this element be picky get a nice intact one they are common. Back in the heyday of stereo-views the machine was often given away for free.
Here we have a card by H. C. White whose production output began in 1899 and was almost as great as Keystone and Underwood though, the quality of White's stereo-views are of higher standards than its rivals.

 Finally many cards are overpriced so shop around you never know when something hard to find like this card of Seti 1's mummy,( though it says it is the mummy of Ramses 2). Have fun!