Volume XXV
Supreme Grand Lodge of A.M.O.R.C., Inc.
Printing and Publishing Department
San Jose, California
1956
This 1946 book was originally published as "Son of the God," but by the 1956 second edition was renamed. The author was the very controversial Savitri Devi, who equated Hinduism to Nazism, with Hitler having been the most recent reincarnation of the Hindu god Vishnu.
The book is on the life and reign of the eighteenth dynasty heretic pharaoh Akhenaton. From the start, I must say that this book has been difficult to get into, even though the facts in the book are nicely presented, but very outdated. I guess when you're a 64-year-old book based on science, there are bound to be those gaps of knowledge that came along later.
The author presents the pharaoh Akhenaton as a gentle, loving soul of great vision, a true family man, glorious, beneficent, and sugar-coated. This made me a little noxious with the potentially spoiled mentally ill tyrannical dictator being covered in a thick layer of literary butterscotch.
I was not enjoying this, but I persevered in hopes it would turn around, yet it did not, and yes, it was clear to me the author was well read, though Ms. Devi had drifted off to her own garden of the Aton. There are times that I feel like I am drowning in the gush (adoration) being put forward by the author.
If you are the type who likes to spend Saturday night at home reading the bible, then this might be for you, but the theological language makes me feel like the author is trying to indoctrinate me into the cult of Aton. The author is obsessed with the vision of the beauty that was Akhenaton; she obviously never saw the colossal statues from the Gem Pa Aton, which, though powerful and intimidating, are not beautiful, nor is the guard road that surrounds the site of his capital, Akhetaton.
I found the book to be more of an interpretation of the religion of the Aton to suit the author's theology, a theology which, for me, is simplified and made to order. I could not get over my own feelings that the great visionary prophet of the Aton was no friend to the common people but an entitled king who protected his eccentricities by isolating his followers just as cult leaders do today.
The book ends with a chapter on the modern religions in a comparative exercise of theological fantasy, ending with the Aton being in possession of the truth according to Ms. Devi. The author was clearly intelligent, but all that knowledge did not make for an interesting read; rather, the king whom the author was extolling became lost within the book's religious message.
Ms. Devi's desire to extol her own theology as that of Akhenaton made for a tediously long and tiring read, and though I know that something here went over my head, I couldn't care less but to give praise to my own lord that I have finished this dull and unrewarding book.