Friday, February 26, 2010

WV 22?

I have noticed on a number of sites that one of the mummies recently studied by Dr. Hawass has been given the designation of WV 22. The mummy in question was found in the valley of kings in KV 35 in a side chamber with an inscription identifying it as Amenhotep III, the king who owned the tomb in the valley of kings marked WV 22.

By giving this mummy a designation of WV 22 implies that the mummy came from that tomb. Certainly we know the mummy was not removed from WV 22 in modern times. The mummy may well be Amenhotep III but to put the designation WV 22 on that mummy is an assumption based on insufficient evidence to my knowledge?

True the badly damaged mummy was inscribed as Amenhotep III but lying in a coffin trough for Ramses III with a lid for Seti II. It is also true that Amenhotep III and his queen Tiye enjoyed a long reign and as a result the kings tomb in the valley WV 22 was more than likely finished and well provisioned with their funerary equipment, that is not proof the king or his queen or the mummy in question were ever buried in it.

3 comments:

Shemsu Sesen said...

Hmm..

Maybe an Amenhotep III Museum is being planned?

(Couldn't resist..)

Good post. Stirs up the ole grey matter, for sure.

tim said...

Hello Shemsu Sesen

Hmm...

"Ole grey matter" doesn't that need to be reported to the SCA within six months? It may be classified as an antiquity under the new law.

Thanks

Shemsu Sesen said...

True. I would hate for my brain to be "repatriated"!!