This is not a new post but rather an old "Dig days" by the fine doctor. I put it in again as the doctors proof of fatherhood being Akenaten is not proven by the evidence the doctor displays.
How do I not know that the inscription of Tut's father are not talking about Smenkara, no king is mentioned as the father of Tutankhamun.
The mention of the father of Ankhesenpaaten does not imply fatherhood of king Tut, rather the lack of king Tut's fathers attribution is more telling and probably Ankhesenpaaten's lineage is a consolidation to stabilize an already badly damaged monarchy.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2009/929/he2.htm
0 comments:
Post a Comment